Monday, December 9, 2019

Using Inversion Tables for Low Back Pain


Is using inversion tables for low back pain a good idea? Is it safe? Who shouldn't use one?
These are all very important questions for anyone considering inverting. Although simply hanging upside down may seem benign, it can aggravate certain types of health conditions. In this article I'll discuss what I've learned in my experience with inversion tables and what my chiropractor has told me about using them.
Over the years my back has taken a beating from martial arts, running, scoliosis, sciatica and a bad car wreck. However, the last thing I wanted to do was give up being physically active. I didn't want to completely stop my martial arts training, my weight lifting and my running. - But, I definitely wanted to completely stop my low back pain and other issues like sciatica.
For many years I had tried medication, stretching, physical therapy, massage therapy and chiropractic care in order to treat my back issues. Yes, all of these methods helped to some degree. However, I didn't want to have to depend on expensive prescription medications forever. Medications that would make me drowsy and worthless. I also didn't like the expensive bills that came with physical therapy.
In the end, the best options for me seemed to be chiropractic care and massage therapy together. These two seemed to be a great natural way of easing my back pain, but again, these things cost money.
After realizing the amount of money I was spending on my chiropractor and massage therapy, I began to look at other options. My friend had been using inversion tables for low back pain for the past few years and said I should really give it a shot. So, I did.
My first time on one of these tables, I didn't completely invert, but the experience was still amazing. As soon as I was partially inverted, I felt relief from the weight of my body being lifted off of my spine. It was pretty amazing.
So the next time I saw my chiropractor, I decided to ask for her thoughts on using inversion tables for low back pain.
She said that using inversion tables could be really good for the back because they decompress the spine. Decompressing the spine is healthy because as people get older the discs in the spinal column get dried out and decompression of the spine helps to re-lube the spine which is very healthy.
She did say however that people with high blood pressure, glaucoma and people with certain heart problems should probably not use inversion tables. Also people who have had back surgery and neck problems should not use inversion tables. In short she said, just check with your doctor.
Anyway, I was pleased to find out that she approved. Because for me, I had already tried one of the best inversion tables around and could majorly feel the difference.
So yes, using inversion tables for low back pain can definitely work. - But always remember to check with your doctor first. Especially if you have any health conditions or are taking any medications. Article written by Elvis.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9397160

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Back Pain As A Result Of Breast Augmentation


Women with large breasts often complain about the back pain that they experience as a result. Such back pain ranges from mild to severe, with some even developing poor posture as a result. Large breasts also put women at a risk of developing spinal deformity. The weight of the breasts may cause strain on your shoulder and chest muscles.
These are important considerations you should keep in mind if you want to increase your breast size significantly through augmentation surgery.
Why Do Large Breasts Cause Back and Spinal Problems?
Larger breasts tend to cause a shift in the centre of gravity which leads to a whole host of other problems in the body. Large breasts are additional weights which extend far beyond your normal centre of gravity, leading to up to 10 times the amount of pressure being placed on the spinal column.
This is a problem that slowly develops which leads to other complications in the long run. The resulting change in posture may lead to disc hernia or a pinched nerve.
How Large Breasts Affect Posture
It's a subconscious effort that women make to change their posture in order to compensate for the additional weight from particularly large breast implants. The upper back tends to pull back, pushing the chest out and causing an arc to form in the lower back. Doing this will give you temporary relief, but over time, it will become harder for you to maintain that kind of posture. Eventually, it leads to back pain and spinal injuries.
Complications from Larger Breasts
The change in your spinal curve may lead to numerous problems that will affect nerves, back skin, bones and muscles.
As a result of the increase in breast size, the right kind of support bra is needed. Because of the extra weight, bra straps may dig into your skin, causing permanent bruising. The bruising can lead to skin chaffing which in turn causes breast fungus.
Lordosis is another complication that may develop as a result of having large breasts. It is characterized by increased curvature of the spine as a result of increased weight. Lordosis causes frequent pain in the back. It sometimes leads to muscle cramps as well as pinched nerves.
Also, women with large breasts tend to develop a duck walk, which is characterized by the jutting out of the lower back as a result of the body accommodating the additional weight.
If you choose to have breast augmentation, you may want to keep these facts in mind. Ensure your doctor knows about your concerns by voicing them. He/she should have an understanding of the kind of effect increased breasts will have on your body.
Before you undergo surgery, it's important for you to determine whether your body weight can handle the additional weight of the boobs. A lot of women make the mistake of choosing the biggest size they come across when it comes to choosing breast implants. A shady surgeon will happily increase your breast size with little regard to the implications it may have on your health.
Article Source:http://EzineArticles.com/9398693

Saturday, December 7, 2019

The Link Between Mental Health and Back Pain


Some medical professionals suggest depression could be the most common emotion associated with chronic pain. Medically known as major depression or clinical depression, the mental symptoms that patients experience go beyond the normal emotions of sadness that everyone feels at some point or another. Clinical or major depression is more likely to be diagnosed in patients suffering from chronic back pain than those who experience acute or short term problems with their backs. This article explains how being aware of the host of symptoms associated with chronic back conditions goes a long way to understanding why depression sometimes develops.
For many patients living with long-term back discomfort, being able to get a good night's sleep is close to impossible. This can lead to fatigue and irritability during the day which can contribute to continuous feelings of negativity and low mood. On top of that, there is the possibility of not being able to take part in activities with the family, which again, can leave the patient feeling low, disconnected and isolated.
The points below highlight some of the main reasons why back pain can often lead to depression:
·         Chronic back conditions can make it difficult to sleep which can lead to extreme tiredness, irritability and frustration during the day.

·         Back pain can cause some people to become inactive movement which results in spending a lot of time at home. This can lead to the patient feeling socially isolated and unable to enjoy regular activities with friends and family.

·         If a patient is unable to work due to their back problems, financial stress and strain may have an impact on the entire family.

·         Gastrointestinal problems may arise as a result of taking anti-inflammatory medication. Some patients suffering from back issues also report "brain fog" or feeling mentally "dull" as a result of pain medications.

·         Many back pain sufferers lose interest in a physical relationship with their partners, which can put more stress and strain on relationships.
Contact your GP or medical professional if you are experiencing long-term back problems and any of the following symptoms:
·         Regularly feeling depressed, sad, irritable or hopeless
·         Crying for no obvious reason or crying more than usual
·         A reduced appetite or unusual weight loss
·         An increased appetite or unusual weight gain
·         Sleeping difficulties - either sleeping too much or too little
·         Low energy and fatigue
·         Agitation
·         Reduction or loss of interest in usual hobbies/ activities
·         Reduced/ diminished sex drive
·         Feeling worthless or guilty
·         Lack of concentration or memory problems
·         Suicidal thoughts (contact 999 immediately)

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9395687

Friday, December 6, 2019

Permanent Cure For Back Pain


Nowadays, lower back pain is on the list of common disorders. Back pain, especially the lower back ache is a chronic condition where the patient suffers from a persistent mild or sharp pain in their back. Besides, the pain may accompany stiffness, burning, tingling and numbness. If you are looking for the best cure for this pain, Ayurveda is the answer. Let's take a look at the causes and treatment methods of the lower back pain in Ayurveda.
Causes
Mostly, backache is the result of the poor posture. With balanced posture, you can reduce strain on your back, as the right posture will keep the bones, muscles and other parts of the body in the natural position.
When you maintain an abnormal sitting position for several hours, your spinal curve may get hurt or you may end up with pulled muscles. This can cause muscle contraction that can cause pain.
Other disorders that can trigger back pain include spinal stenosis, scoliosis, and osteoporosis. Besides, straining or spraining of the ligaments or muscles in your back can also cause the pain.
If the tissues around your spine suffer from a prolonged stress, or the tissues get damaged due to a hard blow, you may get pain in your back. A sedentary lifestyle is another most common cause.
Treatment methods
The traditional treatment for the lower back pain involves the use of drugs and surgical operations. These treatments don't work in all the cases because most people don't have backache due to an injury. Instead, the pain is the response of the mind and body to an underlying condition.
According to Ayurveda, lower back pain occurs because of the vitiation of any of the 3 main doshas. The backache is an indicator of the weakness of bones/muscles and Vata aggravation.
Ayurvedic Treatments
In Ayurveda, the treatment of most diseases and conditions is to balance the three doshas. In Ayurveda hospitals, both internal and external treatments are used to help patients get rid of the backache. Herbal stuff, such as Asthavargam is given to the patients. Apart from this, daily purgation is also used to "fix" the vitiated doshas.
Abhyanga, which is an Ayurvedic Panchakarma way of treatment requires you to get an oil massage. Besides, Basti is really helpful for relief from the pain and fix abnormalities. If you want to use Ayurvedic herbal medicine, you can go for Mahanarayana tailam, Triphala Guggul, Lakshadiguggul and Yogarajagugul, just to name a few.
Yogasana for the Lower back pain
At times, the pain in the back occurs when you push yourself beyond your emotional or physical capacity. Your spine should be stable. For the stability of the spine, your mind should be steady.
You first step is to train your mind to relax, and then focus on the areas of the back that hurt. With a little bit of practice on a daily basis, you can easily redirect the energy of your mind to get relief from the pain.

Article Source:http://EzineArticles.com/9397151

Thursday, December 5, 2019

Why More People Are Choosing Chiropractic Over Drugs and Surgery for Back Pain?


Conventional medicine is built on treating illnesses with two tools and only two tools: drugs and surgery. You can visualize a conventional doctor as a workman who carries only a hammer and a screw driver. To be fair, they're the absolute best hammer and screw driver that science can build, and the workman is very, very good with those particular tools; if you need a nail or screw driven, this is the guy you want to hire.
But back pain isn't all just nails to be hammered and screws to be driven. Back pain can be caused by multiple factors, and each cause can require a different kind of treatment. Would it make sense to fix everything with only two tools even though that the problem may require other tools? Would it be better to patch the road or fix it at its root?
For example, if drugs are used to treat a spinal misalignment, will that correct that misalignment that is causing the pain? Or will that just temporary inhibit the pain without treating the cause? Ultimately, medications are there to just block the pain, and although this eases the anguish associated with back pain, it does not restore the functional biomechanics. Even worse, while prescription drugs can be effective at treating pain, in most cases they can't do anything to fix the underlying problem causing that pain. This means that if you want that pain to stay away, you have to keep taking those drugs until the cause of the pain somehow fixes itself. That's a life sentence of sky-high medical bills and side effects!
Pain is a sign that something is seriously wrong with the body, and blocking that mechanism will only cause more damage in the long run. Wouldn't it be better to treat the underlying problem and restore its proper function?
And surgery, while generally more effective at treating the root cause of a problem, can be even more dangerous. Iatrogenic disease-that is, illnesses caused by doctors-is currently the number three cause of death for Americans, behind only cancer and heart disease. Every time a patient goes under the knife, no matter how necessary, they are taking their life in their hands. Again, there are certainly conditions where surgery is the best option, but why put up with the risks of surgery when there are alternative treatments that can deal with a problem before it gets bad enough for surgery to be the only option?
In short, when it comes to back pain, conventional medicine comes at the problem with nothing but that hammer and screw driver, and whatever the cause of the pain may be, those are the tools you get. Given the alternative, wouldn't you rather be treated by someone with a complete toolbox, a medical practitioner who approaches each problem by its own standards instead of using the same approach to every malady?
Considering how inadequate the drugs-and-surgery method is at effectively treating back pain, is it any surprise that millions of Americans are seeing Doctors of Chiropractic? Chiropractic medicine, unlike conventional medicine, isn't about treating symptoms, but about treating people. Doctors of Chiropractic make use of a wide range of methods and equipment to treat a variety of problems. After all, chronic disorders such as back pain result in almost 80% of health care expenditures in the United States, and chronic disease can't generally be fixed with drugs or surgery. Chiropractor helps patients look at their lifestyle and medical history as a whole so they can treat the root cause of chronic pain-and "treat" doesn't mean "make it go away by taking a pill."
Let's examine why more and more people are looking to chiropractor to treat their back pain:
Chiropractic is Safe and All Natural
Compared to the dangers of surgery as described above, chiropractic is incredibly safe, with injury to patients during spinal manipulation reported in fewer than one in three million adjustments. Doctors of chiropractic make use of all natural remedies instead of relying on prescription drugs, which lead to millions of hospitalizations annually. The safety of chiropractic explains why malpractice insurance is one of the lowest of any medical practitioner.
Chiropractic is Effective for Back Pain
The effectiveness of chiropractic in treating back pain has been proven countless times. In fact, chiropractic is so effective that the Ontario Ministry of Health recommended that chiropractic should be the preferred treatment for lower back pain, with traditional medicine not even in the running. Chiropractic patients have reported being happier with chiropractic treatment than traditional medicine in startling numbers, citing the communicativeness of chiropractor, the low cost of treatment compared to traditional medicine, and most importantly, the effectiveness at reducing pain compared to drugs and surgery.
Chiropractic Has Shown to Reduce Hospital Admissions and Healthcare Costs
Doctors of Chiropractic don't just keep their patients safe when treating back pain; they actually reduce hospital admissions as a result of their treatment. According to the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, patients who saw chiropractor as their primary care physician experienced 43% fewer hospitalizations and had more than 50% reduction of their pharmaceutical costs. Considering how many hospital visits result in iatrogenic disease, it's not only better financially to avoid hospitalization, it's a lot safer, too!
Chiropractic is the not answer to every health ailment. However, for musculoskeletal issues such as back and neck pain, headaches, and other related disorders, it is a safer and more effective treatment than drugs and surgery.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9367338

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Chronic Refractory Myofascial Pain and Denervation Supersensitivity As Global Public Health Disease


CASE HISTORY
A 63 year old successful entrepreneur/mountaineer suffered disabling chronic LBP and left buttock pain after an 8 feet (2.4 metres) fall in 2011 with pain aggravation 5 months later from a physically-challenging expedition. He had laminotomy with lumbar disc removal when contrast MRI in 2013 showed L4-L5 broad-based left paracentral disc extrusion with central canal narrowing and mass effect on bilateral L5 roots. Other MRI findings included L4-L5 retrolisthesis, C5-C7 degenerative disc changes, lower thoracic Schmorl's nodes, L1-S1 small broad-based disc bulges, moderate sacro-iliac joint arthritis bilaterally, left hip labral tear and old right total hip arthroplasty. Spine X-Rays showed 24° lumbar levoscoliosis.
Post-spinal surgery, pain worsened, not alleviated with physical therapy, manual stretching, inversion spinal traction, epidural injectionsx3, chiropractic/osteopathic manipulations, anti-inflammatory medications, short and long-acting opioides, acupuncture and alternative methods. Pain severely compromised going up inclines/steps and ambulation to 500-1000 feet (150-300 metres) necessitating back and hip muscle stretches every 5-10 minutes. Pain-scale was 6/10 on presentation on August 7, 2014. Examination showed moderate range of motion limitation of neck, back, shoulders and hips with core muscle weakness, especially on the left. There were no sensory deficits or upper motor neuron signs.
Pain-scale reduced from 6/10 to 2/10 with first DTPS session stimulating the MTrPs confirming predominant myofascial involvement. He continued with DTPS. Nine months into treatment, he successfully completed travelling in an expedition, his first since 2011 during which he walked 4-6 miles (6.4-9.6 km) on most days. During the 60 day vacation hiatus beginning June 1, 2015 to July 30, 2015, he performed self DTPS but due to frequent, strenuous activities, pain-scale increased to 6/10. In the 45 day period prior to and after the expedition his treatment sessions lasted 115+12.9 minutes and 120+6.6 minutes respectively indicating more difficulty in eliciting large force twitches due to tightness of muscles. Electrical supersensitivity related twitching at remote sites gradually returned but he lost ability to mechanically provoke autonomous twitch-trains.
For further improvement and/or maintenance of QOL, he requires and still receives ongoing, self-applied and professionally-applied DTPS.
GLOBAL HEALTH PROBLEM ANALYSIS
Discussion: 
Scope of chronic pain
Chronic pain (CP) is a world-wide public health problem affecting physiological, psychological and social well-being. There are 1.5 billion CP sufferers worldwide (American Academy of Pain Medicine web-site), including 100 million American adults. In the United States, annual CP care is estimated at $635 billion, which is more than cost/year for cancer, heart disease and diabetes, costing $243, $309 and $188 billion respectively. Total incremental cost of pain health-care is $261-$300 billion, private insurers paid the largest share ($112-$129 billion), government programs (Medicare and Medicaid) bore 25% ($66-$76 billion) and 8% ($20-$23 billion) respectively with individuals paying an additional $44-$51 billion in out-of-pocket health-care expense. CP negatively impacts annual number of work-days, work-hours and wages resulting in lost productivity of $299-$334 billion.
With global child survival improvement and increasing aging populations, the number of people experiencing LBP and NP will escalate since CP increases with age. CP dominate patients' lives, causing disabilities in family/home responsibilities, occupational, social, recreational, sleep and sexual activities. Pain-related investigations and treatments often make CP worse affecting patients' interactions with coworkers, physicians, family and social network creating alienation and isolation.
Constant pain interferes with ability to concentrate, impairs cognition with mood/memory alterations from effects of medications. World Health Organization data obtained in primary care centres worldwide show that 22% of all primary care patients suffer from CP. They are four times more likely to have co-morbid anxiety/depression than pain-free patients.
LBP causes more global disability than any other condition. NP and LBP have no associated mortality but morbidity rate for CP is higher than the general population. YLD and disability adjusted life years (DALY) is high. In 2010, DALY for NP rose to 33.6 million and 83.0 million for LBP. Systematic reviews of LBP treatments utilized in developed countries and treatments available in developing countries, heat/ice/ultrasound/traction, are discussed later.
Spine XRays and imaging studies for establishing presence of intervertebral disc pathology or spinal degenerative diseases for diagnosis of NP and LBP are not available/feasible in resource poor settings. Despite significant multilevel spine imaging abnormalities, our patient had objective improvements in pain and QOL with DTPS indicating that XRays/imaging studies correlate poorly with clinical symptoms.
It is essential to authenticate CRMP, the most common type of CP, as a ubiquitous neuromusculoskeletal disease resulting from spondylotic radiculopathies induced partial denervation with denervation supersensitivity (DS). Public health priorities necessitate an urgent need for a safe, efficacious, practical and objective cost-effective system with potential for prevention (pre-rehabilitation) with simultaneous real-time ability to clinically diagnose, treat (rehabilitation) and provide prognosis in of acute and CRMP management.
MTrPs/Motor Point Identification
MTrPs are pathognomonic of MP, clinically identifiable when pressure at this point causes referred pain and snapping palpation of the myofascial band produces local twitch response. Meta-analysis does not recommend physical examination as a reliable test for diagnosis of MTrPs.
Electrophysiologically, motor point is where single muscle contractions can occur with minimum intensity and short duration electrical pulses. Anatomically it is the area where motor endplates, namely terminal area of motor nerve fibres are dense. Electrically-evoked single muscle twitch contractions precisely locate MTrPs.
Twitches in Denervation Supersensitivity (DS)
Within 6-8 days of denervation, DS develops due to acetylcholine (Ach) receptor increase and decrease in acetylcholinesterase activity. DS can also occur in prolonged conduction block.
Twitches exercise and stretch individual muscles promoting local blood flow specifically to that muscle. Rat skeletal muscle experiments show that twitch contractions from 1Hz stimulation increase muscle blood flow by 240%.
DEEP TRIGGER POINT STIMULATION (DTPS) also known as ELECTRICAL TWITCH OBTAINING INTRAMUSCULAR STIMULATION  
Twitches in DS
Force, firing pattern, ease/difficulty of twitch elicitation of deep MTrPs objectively aids clinical differentiation of normal condition from partial denervation of spondylotic radiculopathy. Grade1 twitches result from focalized, partial contraction of stimulated muscle(s) at MTrP. Stronger twitch force on the electrode overlying MTrP with DS gives an asymmetrical, bouncy feedback on the bipolar probe with 6 inches (15 cm) separation between two water-wetted surface electrodes. Grade 2 twitches additionally show rocking/shaking limb and/or trunk movements from stimulation of MTrPs of deep muscles apposed to bone and joint. Grade 3 twitches produce anti-gravity limb movements due to whole muscle(s) contraction. This indicates proximal stimulus spread to many and/or larger nerves from antidromic/ephaptic/direct stimulation, and/or distal spread of the current front due to DS. Grade 4 twitches produce antigravity limb movements with firing rate slower than applied pulses due to erratic stimulation of MTrPs with DS from filter effect of tight and stiff overlying tissues. Ability to elicit Grade 4 twitches is recognized when joint movements suddenly become stronger. On halting DTPS, joint movements continue autonomously lasting from a few seconds to >10 minutes before fatiguing. Grade 5 twitches produce anti-gravity movements with firing rate faster than applied pulse-frequency and rapidly fatigue within a few seconds indicating full, instantaneous depolarization of MTrPs with DS in non-tight muscle.
A pre-fatigue phenomenon heralds onset of Grade 5 twitches as multiple twitches/pulse instead of normal single-twitch/pulse. On continuing stimulation, sudden increase in twitch-rate, rhythm and force occurs before erupting into autonomous fatigable twitches. When the twitch-cascade ends, DTPS can be re-applied repeatedly for 1-5 minutes at this motor end plate zone until the entire muscle becomes refractory at which time another patient position is used for stimuli to reach other MTrPs with DS within same muscle.
Pathophysiology of autonomous twitches is similar to cardiac dysrhythmias.
Deep MTrPs are difficult to seek in CRMP due to muscle stiffness, tightness, tenderness and poor tolerance to electrical stimulation. In normal muscles, finding MTrPs is immediate, pleasant and painless. There is non-forceful symmetrical feedback on both electrodes and Grades 3-5 twitches do not occur.
To facilitate twitching, relaxed muscle(s) is positioned at slight stretch advantageous for contraction, stimulating along less electrically-resistive intermuscular/intramuscular grooves. If elicited twitches are Grade 1 force, patient re-positioning in supine/prone/side-lying, sitting, standing, etc., and/or clinician repositioning is necessary to obtain the correct angle to locate/effectively stimulate the MTrP with DS. To obtain pain relief, minimum Grade 2 force is essential. Grade 3-5 forces in CRMP will not occur until many professional hours of consecutive treatments. Such twitches are elicitable at acute MTrPs with DS within non-tight muscles.
Stimulus parameters used for evoking twitches are similar to those used in electrodiagnostic medicine for peripheral nerve conduction studies. Repetitive stimulation at 2-3 Hz tests stability of neuromuscular transmission by temporarily depleting Ach at diseased or immature endplates causing fatigue in neuropathic conditions. Similarly, using 2-3 Hz, fatigable autonomous twitches elicited with DTPS signify neurogenic involvement with unstable neuromuscular transmission in CRMP.
MP Theories
Muscle trauma, overload, or strain causes endplate damage, resulting in excessive Ach release. This provokes local, partial muscle fibre contraction beneath the endplate and muscle fibre contracture leads to ischemia and pain. The neuromuscular junction is the site most susceptible to acute ischemia. Dysfunctional end plate exhibiting increased ACh release may be the starting point for abnormal regional contractions, which may be essential for the formation of MTrPs.
Spondylotic radiculopathies causes MP from intramuscular entrapment of nerves and blood vessels. Partial denervation induced shortened/tightened muscle fibres produce tension on pain sensitive regions, e.g. annulus fibrosus, bones and joints. Others have also found MTrPs in radiculopathies. Intervertebral disc degeneration, with nerve root compression/angulation from reduced intervertebral space, causing neuropathy which leads to distal muscle spasm in radicular distribution. Pain results from shortened/tight muscle fibres compressing small/large blood vessels leading to ischemia. Bradykinin and other neurochemical release sensitizes and/or excites nociceptors.
Systematic Reviews of Treatments for CRMP
Many methods are available to directly treat MTrPs to inactivate, disrupt or suppress MTrP activity. Systematic reviews have not shown MTrPs treatments with Botox, steroids, acupuncture or dry needling to be effective. In order to improve dry needling results in CRMP, the corresponding author first developed Automated Twitch-Obtaining Intramuscular Stimulation, which employs mechanical stimulation with a monopolar needle oscillated 3 times in 2 seconds. To facilitate twitching, she then created/engineered needle DTPS device that could deliver electrical pulses through a single automatic insertion and retraction of the monopolar needle. These methods were discontinued when she implemented the safe, efficacious, non-traumatic and non-invasive DTPS.  Needling methods cause pain, bleeding, bruising and tissue trauma and thus not indicated for repetitive/frequent applications throughout the body in CRMP patients requiring life-long regular treatments.
Systematic Reviews of LBP Treatments
Therapies for chronic LBP not showing high quality evidence for improving pain intensity, functional status, global improvement and return to work include lumbar supports, traction, superficial heat and cold, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, low level laser therapy, muscle energy techniques, spinal manipulation techniques and chiropractic treatments.
In acute and chronic LBP, massage improves pain and function only short-term. Direct manual/mechanical stimulation mobilizes superficial muscles but deep massage can produce pain as an adverse event. DTPS accurately focalizes stimulation to MTrPs with DS and has minimal tendency to cause post-treatment pain which can be resolved with longer/more treatment sessions.
In neuropathic conditions, in hypertensive patients, and the elderly with significant tightness and stiffness, it is necessary that DTPS be applied essentially pain-free using only stimulation parameters that the patient can tolerate and settling for Grade1-2 twitches. The probe must be lifted off the skin every 2-4 twitches so that the stimulus on the non-twitching/poor twitching muscle does not undergo repetitive sub-threshold stimulation leading to spasm and pain during and after treatment. Patients may tolerate pain during treatment thinking erroneously that enduring strong stimulation will obtain larger twitches. Contrarily, pain-induced involuntary tightening of muscles during DTPS will inhibit deep penetration of electricity into the tissues causing pain during and after treatment. The clinician must watch patients' facial expressions and listen for sighs/moans or objective physical distress signs related to increased sympathetic tone such as pilomotor, vasomotor and sudomotor reflexes and reduce stimulation strength accordingly.
Blood pressure and pulse rate reduction have been noted after pain relieving massage attributable to increased parasympathetic tone and sympathetic tone inhibition. Regular exercise in older active individuals lowers both SBP and PP compared to sedentary counterparts. Similarly regular DTPS sessions are useful aerobic exercises that reduce blood pressure and pulse proportional to twitch force.
There is insufficient evidence to support use of epidural injection to facet joints and nerve blocks in LBP. US Food and Drug Administration reports paraplegia, quadriplegia, spinal cord infarction, and stroke from technique-related problems such as intrathecal injection, epidural hematoma, direct spinal cord injury, and embolic infarction after inadvertent intra-arterial injection.
Systematic reviews on medications do not show clear evidence that anti-depressants, are more effective than placebo in chronic LBP. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute and chronic LBP without sciatica. Muscle relaxants are effective in management of non-specific LBP, but adverse effects require cautious use. Opioids compared to NSAIDs or antidepressants did not show differences regarding pain and function. There are no placebo-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supporting effectiveness and safety of long-term opioid therapy for treatment of chronic LBP.
Gabapentin at doses of 1200 mg or more is effective for some people with some painful neuropathic pain conditions. Gabapentin (1200 mg) use on this patient an hour before DTPS reduced pain which facilitated twitch elicitation.
Conflicting evidence exists on short-term effect of radiofrequency lesioning in chronic LBP and disability of zygapophyseal origin. Intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation is not effective for chronic discogenic LBP.
Evidence for minimally invasive discectomy (MID) although associated with shorter hospital stay has been found inferior in terms of relief of leg pain, LBP and re-hospitalization and our patient fits this profile. More research is needed to define appropriate indications for MID as alternative to standard open discectomy.
Systematic review of RCTs on stretching suggests that before, after, or before-after exercise stretching, does not produce clinically important reductions in delayed-onset muscle soreness in healthy adults. Chronic MP patients who did stretching for three weeks did not demonstrate effectiveness in improving muscle extensibility, although stretching increased tolerance to stretch-associated discomfort. When stiff hamstrings are subjected to eccentric exercise, strength loss, pain, muscle tenderness, and increased creatine kinase activity occurs. This is consistent with the sarcomere strain theory of muscle damage showing experimental evidence of association between flexibility and tendency to muscle injury.
Mechanical stretch forces delivered from the surface occur to many muscles simultaneously and are not effective in stretching shortened muscle fibres at deep MrTPs. The solution to make stretching consistently more effective lies in finding new methods including DTPS. Effective summation of twitch-induced stretch forces focused to MTrPs are best with repetitive 1-3 Hz stimulation.
Not commonly recognized is thixotropy of muscle which is a ubiquitous and functionally important phenomenon since it results from tendency of actin and myosin filaments to stick together when inactive for a period of time. Passive properties of thixotropy can be reduced with previous movements as evident with preventive warm-up activities of athletes before strenuous sports. Overcoming thixotropy may be the basis by which DTPS is able to clinically improve function in muscle tightness without pain, fibromyalgia, stroke or Parkinsonism. Reduced muscle thixotropy/stiffness persists as long as motion persisted but will return to its previous state. Stiffness reduction afforded by twitch exercise allows more mobility and the increased mobility and increased blood flow perpetuates to improve muscle function and QOL.
Improving Denervation Supersensitivity Related CRMP
Partial denervation and/or conduction block in the presence of DS leads to ongoing MTrPs formation in many myotomes at various times daily with ADL. Morphologic and electromyographic studies have demonstrated atrophy and delayed activation of deep muscles of the spine in patients with chronic NP and chronic LBP. Decrease in maximum force of deep back muscles improve resultant joint moments and reduce the stabilization function provided by these muscles to the lumbar spine. Exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic LBP. There is conflicting evidence for effectiveness of exercise in reducing the number of recurrences or the recurrence rate.
DTPS is aerobic exercise therapy to individual muscles. If there is no pain relief with the first DTPS session, the primary diagnosis of CP is not CRMP and other causes need consideration, e.g. neuropathic, inflammatory, psychiatric or nociceptive. Further DTPS sessions are advised even in such patients to treat co-morbid CRMP and/or muscle tightness to facilitate management of the primary pain.
For best functional results optimal treatment in CRMP includes these 5 muscle areas: trapezius, latissimus dorsi, gluteus maximus, adductor magnus, and paraspinal muscles from neck to sacral areas. This is needed even if patient presents only with NP/upper limb pain or LBP/lower limb pain as in this patient. Additionally, other muscles connected to the thoracolumbar fascia and along the kinetic chain must be treated proximo-distally starting with the largest muscles that cross multiple joints to small muscles of hands and feet as needed. Treatments begin with weakened muscles exposed to injurious eccentric contractions before directing treatments to strong muscles used primarily for concentric contractions. In the presence of weak symptomatic-side muscles, asymptomatic-side muscles are stronger by default and from overuse developing MTrPs that need treatment. This balances chronic strong pull of muscles toward asymptomatic side that more weakens symptomatic side. Treatments begin on the symptomatic-side starting with upper trapezius MTrPs with DS which can be easily located. Through its myofascial connections, other muscles on the symptomatic side become easier to treat. Provided MTrPs with DS are stimulated, Grades 3-5 twitch elicitation is facilitated by aged neuromuscular junctions exhibiting enhanced pre-synaptic nerve terminal branching, post-synaptic distribution of neurotransmitter receptor sites, increased Ach quantal content and more rapid decline of endplate potential strength during continuous pre-synaptic neuron stimulation.
Additionally, central sensitization amplifies DS. Noxious stimuli and/or misinterpretation of non-noxious stimuli (secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia) can induce chronic pain. Injury induced functional and adaptive changes include ineffective synapses unmasking, receptive field shifts and reorganization or altered effectiveness of surviving neural networks at the brain cortex level as well at peripheral nerves and receptors.
DTPS Role in CRMP
With DTPS we have originated an algorithm with consistent pain/discomfort relief and reproducible results without concurrent use of multiple medications or other therapies. Presence of DS in CRMP requires that treatments be safe and effective for regular life-long use on the entire body. We studied our case with statistical process control (SPC). Studying one case in detail sequentially over time can produce statistical results superior to that of a RCT. In these circumstances SPC has greater statistical power to exclude chance as an explanation.
DTPS is suitable for use in developing countries since it is cost effective. 
LEARNING POINTS/TAKE HOME MESSAGES
1. CRMP is a neuromusculoskeletal disease caused by spondylotic radiculopathies following acute or chronic cumulative trauma with DS induced peripheral and central, mechanical and electrical hyper-excitability.
2. The mediate cause of CRMP is neuromuscular ischemia at deep MTrPs in tightened/shortened/stiffened muscles from spondylotic radiculopathy related partial denervation that maintains/aggravates CRMP.
3. Systematic reviews show lack of effective treatments for CRMP. As CRMP is a global public health problem with huge economic toll on society, governments of developed and developing nations should invest in safe, efficacious, cost effective novel systems such as DTPS for its prevention and management.
4. DTPS is a safe and efficacious innovation for repetitive, life-long whole body treatments for CRMP management as a real-time preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic armamentarium. It empowers patients in their own health-care since it can also be self-performed.
5. Commonly available sphygmomanometer is useful as an inexpensive, practical, objective, real-time pain monitor for clinical follow-up of DTPS treatments.
PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE
I, Crawford Hill, had a spinal surgery two years ago in July 2013. The hypothesis was that my inability to walk uphill effectively was severely compromised by a herniated disc at L4-L5. I had had several injuries and trauma which probably contributed to the problem, whether it was a herniated disc or some other cause of compromising function- especially walking uphill. One of these was an expedition trip to Ecuador during which I was on a boat which slammed up and down for four hours. I had to tighten my buttock intensely and hold on for the entire boat-ride. The next day I was on a horse which trotted causing me more bouncing effects on my spine for four hours. This was an extreme challenge as I had to tighten my buttock again to endure the bouncing up-and down. These two back to back incidents followed about five months after I fell from a rock climb gym wall. After that fall, I laid on the padded mat for several minutes thinking I had severely hurt myself. However I was able to get up and I seemed to be okay. I thought that these injuries did not apparently compromise my function. However on hindsight it probably did - especially in conjunction with the traumatic incidents in Ecuador which I mentioned. Going further back in time about 10 years ago I attempted to water ski and ended up in a very compromised position and felt some tremendous strain on my hamstrings. I let go of the rope and thought that I had damaged my hamstrings severely. However again I was able to function and forgot about the injury.
Going further back in time I did "pull my groin" as they say, in high school football. There was no good treatment available. Lots of heat and inappropriate exercise probably contributed to the injury. However once again I moved on because I was generally very fit and probably have a high tolerance for pain and compromised function. I have tried just about every treatment possible including many versions of physical therapy, gravity-assisted traction, yoga, Feldenkrais exercises, spinal manipulations, acupuncture with four different practitioners, chiropractic release, medications, epidural injections, many anti-inflammatory medications including opioids and even spinal surgery. In addition I have a stretching and myofascial release program which does give me relief. Pain is on my mind 23 hours/day and I sought relief with eToims. After treatment with DTPS within six months, I can feel my affected musculature namely the gluteal and hamstrings muscles returning to function. The deep twitching has released most of the spasms and the muscles feel more functional and I'm ready to start light exercise. In June of 2015, I went on my first expedition since 2011. I went to Crete and I was able to walk on level and inclines for 3-6 miles daily for two weeks. This has been a dramatic development after years of frustration with all the other modalities I tried.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/9309671